Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas to diagnose a case of primary linitis plastica of the colon with retroperitoneal dissemination.

A 54-year-old man had previously undergone curative sigmoidectomy for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with a signet-ring cell component of the sigmoid colon, which was characterized morphologically by stenosis and inelasticity of the colon (linitis plastica). Six weeks after surgery, the patient developed stenosis of the right ureter. Disseminated sigmoid cancer was suspected, and chemotherapy was started. Nine months after initiation of chemotherapy, obstructive jaundice was observed which was due to stenosis of the distal bile duct (BD). Although computed tomography showed no evident metastatic lesion that could cause the stenosis, swelling of the entire pancreas was evident compared to that of 11 months earlier. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) also did not detect any focal masses in the head of the pancreas, although there was a diffuse hypoechoic change in the entire pancreas. Histopathology of the stenotic BD and biopsy specimen from the head of the pancreas showed no malignant cells. Two months after the initial endoscopic bile duct drainage, the patient was admitted again for epigastric pain. A second EUS fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the head of the pancreas was performed and showed poorly differentiated carcinoma with some signet-ring cells. This finding provided histological confirmation of a disseminated pancreatic lesion of the previously resected linitis plastica of the sigmoid colon. This is a rare case of disseminated pancreatic lesion from primary linitis plastica of the colon diagnosed by EUS-FNA.

Successful treatment with endoscopic transpapillary drainage for gallbladder perforation associated with steroid treatment for interstitial pneumonia (with video).

This case report highlights the clinical efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary drainage for gallbladder perforation in a high-risk surgical patient with a history of steroid treatment for interstitial pneumonia. The usefulness of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis has not been established. In difficult cases of emergent surgery, such as described here, endoscopic transpapillary drainage is a promising method to manage gallbladder perforation and acute cholecystitis recurrence.

Comparison of dissection speed during colorectal ESD between the novel Multiloop (M-loop) traction method and ESD methods without traction.

Background and study aims We previously reported on a novel traction method called Multiloop (M-loop) for faster colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, we retrospectively compared the difference in submucosal dissection time (SDT), and submucosal dissection speed (SDS) between groups of patients who were treated using traction with the M-loop method, and with non-traction methods of colorectal ESD. Patients and methods We reviewed and timed duration of colorectal ESD by the non-traction method from videos recorded between June 2016 and December 2017. From January 2018 onward, we used the M-loop method during all colorectal ESDs and timed it until August 2018. Outcomes of colorectal ESD with the M-loop method and non-traction methods were compared. The study involved two experts and eight non-experts and was carried out at a tertiary endoscopic center in Japan. Results The study included 50 patients who treated with the M-loop method and 115 patients treated with the non-traction method. Submucosal dissection time (SDT) was not significantly different (M-loop group, 42.1  ±â€Šâ€Š4.2 min, non-traction ESD group, 51.9 ±â€Š3.3 min) ( P  = 0.098), but submucosal dissection speed (SDS) was significantly greater (M-loop group, 28.0 ±â€Š2.9 mm 2  /min, non-traction ESD group, 19.9 ±â€Š2.0 mm 2 /min) ( P  = 0.0014) in the M-loop method group. Multivariate analysis showed that the M-loop method increased SDS by odds ratio of 1.46 ( P  = 0.001) when compared to the non-traction ESD method. A significant difference was also observed for SDT and SDS when the two methods were compared after propensity score matching ( P  = 0.001). No differences in unfavorable outcomes were observed. Conclusions The M-loop method improved SDS compared to non-traction methods of ESD. The method is an effective tool to assist colorectal ESD.

Multiloop as a novel traction method in accelerating colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Traction methods have been reported to speed up endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We used the multiloop (M-loop) method as a traction method for colorectal ESD and recorded the submucosal dissection time (SDT) and submucosal dissection speed (SDS). METHODS: From January to August 2018, we used the M-loop method for colorectal ESD procedures and timed the duration and recorded the outcomes. Two experts and eight nonexperts performed the procedures, which were carried out at a tertiary endoscopic center in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were treated by colorectal ESD using the M-loop method. The mean SDT was 42.1 ± 4.16 minutes and the mean SDS was 28.0 ± 2.89 mm2/minutes. The mean SDS was 38.9 ± 6.9 mm2/minutes for experts and 25.3 ± 3.1 mm2/minutes for nonexperts. En bloc resection was achieved in 100% of cases. There were 3 adverse events and unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Traction by the M-loop method improved SDS in colorectal ESD. The method can be an effective tool to assist colorectal ESD. Further evaluation of the usefulness of the M-loop method is required in direct comparison with conventional ESD.